I would like to see if the Olympus camera system is right for me and I would like to buy one camera and a couple of lenses to use for 6 month - year before upgrading if necessary.
I like that the E-M1 is a bit older in that it has depreciated such that if I bought one today and they come up with a great new set of bodies in March or April I wont take such a big hit compared with a new E-M5. Also which lenses would you recommend.
I want something that can do close focus under a foot. I don't need macro. I was thinking of the mm f2. Or would I be better off with prime lenses? That's the reason I bought a used EM1, but then found it was worth keeping even after buying an EM1ii.
Which to get : OMD EM-5 or EM-10 ???
For really small I prefer the Panasonic GM5, which is no longer sold. I use the EM1 and EM1ii interchangeably. Most of the time I will grab whichever one has the lens on it that I need. The EM1ii improves on AF for action shots, but that's not the majority of my photography. Regarding lenses. My most often used zoom lens is the 2. However, today the new might be an even better all around choice if you don't mind the larger size.
Virtually nothing is lost with the longer zoom. While these zoom lenses cover many of the popular primes I still like to use a prime on at least one camera body.
I like all of my primes PL 15 1. I guess they tend to quickly become a collection. Surprisingly in the normal focal length range I find the least expensive pancake PL 20 1. EM1 'feels' to me more solid and better built. The EM10 is not. I would recommend a decent guarantee if you get one on one of mine I have 5 years, I took a risk on the other.Olympus E-M5 MKIII vs. E-M5 MKII
It was from ebay with clicks and no guarantee I don't really know how much of a problem this is, obviously the people who have problems are pretty vocal about it and we don't know what percentage of bodies have problems. EM1 has more controls, and I can just about set it up so I never have to go into the menus.
I don't think I could do this with the other two.In fact, at first glance it looks relatively unchanged. The most obvious additions are its more advanced movie capabilities and a clever multi-shot 40MP mode, but you have to look a bit more closely to see how much work Olympus has put into this new model. How do you follow up a classic? A little more time is going to have to pass before the E-M5 can truly wear that mantle but I have little doubt that that's the question Olympus's engineers and product planners have been asking themselves.
And, it must be said, it's quite a challenge. Technology has moved forward since the first OM-D was launched but simply bringing the camera up-to-date risks feeling like a let down. Sure enough, the E-M5 II doesn't feel like as big a step forward as its predecessor was. But how could it be? Cameras such as the Sony's a and a7, and Samsung's NX1 have raised the expected level of capability so far that it would be hard for any new model to represent as much of a breakthrough.
Nonetheless, Olympus has probably done as much as it can to move things forward. Close examination of the camera shows that almost every aspect of its design has been tweaked, refined and polished.
Without access to a higher pixel-count sensor, it's not obvious what else Olympus could have added to the Mark II. These include focus peaking, uncompressed HDMI output, a mic input socket and timecode, amongst others. In addition to these new features, the E-M5 II gains a couple of features that have been introduced in Olympus cameras since the original model's introduction.
Olympus OM-D E-M10 vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 II
These include a version of the 2x2 control system that first appeared on the E-M1. Then, on top of all of these changes, the E-M5 II plays host to a couple of minor behavioral changes that we've been hoping for, for some time. The most prominent is that the camera defaults to using the excellent Super Control Panel user interface, right out of the box. Olympus has also stepped away from the 'modal' display modes: finally allowing you to combine a histogram, level guide and highlight and shadow warnings in any combination you like.
These are small things but they suggest that Olympus is onboard with the current trend of listening to users and being willing to make small changes. Disappointingly the changes to the camera, including the higher resolution viewfinder and screen, have had an impact on battery life.
The E-M5 II is rated at shots per charge, down from shots for the original camera. This increases to shots per charge in 'Quick Sleep' mode but that involves the camera turning off the screen as soon as you take your eye off it. Close comparison of the E-M5 II and its predecessor shows that, while the overall styling is very similar, the two have less in common than you might think. Every face of the camera has been significantly re-worked and features new control points.
Roll your mouse over the right-hand tab and you can see the comparison with the E-M1. It should be immediately apparent how many of the control changes have filtered down from the M5 II's big brother. The E-M1 is a considerably larger, bulkier camera but the two share a great many features and capabilities. The E-M1 is an impressively quick camera to control, once you've configured and become familiar with its 2x2 control system.
The E-M5 II doesn't offer quite the same level of direct control, given the absence of the twin buttons on the left should that re-purpose the command dials.The EM1 does offer more focus points vs the EM5 81 vs 35 and it does offer WiFi, a feature I wish the original EM5 had, as that opens it up not only to easier transferring of images for sharing, but also remote shooting on iOS and Android.
It also does bring a significant advantage for video with the improved IBIS and addition of 24, 25 and 60p shooting at p. The IS comes in three flavors when shooting video. I bought the MkII version almost a month now. I kind of fell onto Olympus. That was a while back but it stuck in my head. The more I read, the more I liked. Funny that you mention the A7 because I am considering the A7II or A7S, but one thing that I do notice is that past 35mm, the size and weight advantage tends to disappear with the size of their lenses.
Panasonic and Olympus seem to be at the helm of the compact SLR market. Having been prime inventors and innovators of mirrorless systems. I might in the future. The video also looked good, looks like they made improvements there and this is compared to the G85 — which I think is really good. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Long story—short: Great size! Almost like a toy.
Great, quick focus. And very sharp. Next purchase: Panasonic f2. Leave A Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.The viewfinder appears unchanged between the two models: both are electronic and make use of a 2. Similarly, both cameras have a 3in LCD that can be adjusted in the same way around a range of angles, and this is sensitive to touch on both bodies.
The cameras are virtually the same size and weight, meaning they can easily slip into a jacket pocket with the collapsible mm EZ zoom kit lens attached. It appears Olympus believes in the redesign, because it has not created an optional grip for the newer model like the one that users can buy with the OM-D E-M10 Mark II.
Despite being ultra compact, both cameras have an intuitive layout, including two control dials and plenty of buttons. Users cannot change the functions of the four-way pad or video record button, and there is one less function button sacrificed to make way for the Shortcut button. So, another minor improvement. Current page: Viewfinder, LCD, build and battery life.
Please deactivate your ad blocker in order to see our subscription offer. Both cameras sport the same EVF and 3in tilting touchscreen.
Olympus has made a number of small ergonomic changes for the OM-D E-M10 Mark III pictured above from the previous model Despite being ultra compact, both cameras have an intuitive layout, including two control dials and plenty of buttons. Both models have built-in flashes and a hot shoe. Considering either camera? Check out our best deals below. See more Features articles.
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II vs OM-D E-M5 III – The 10 Main Differences
Amazon Prime Day final countdown to the big Member Only sale begins!Background - I have a dslr that satisfies most of my needs but am now looking for a walk about camera that I can keep with me and chuck in my pocket. My intention for the camera is to shoot street and any spur of the moment stuff the piques my interest.
Secondhand they are pretty much the same price so I need your help in deciding which one. For still photographers, we feel the Nikon Z5 represents the best value for the money when it comes to full-frame mirrorless cameras.
Which is why it receives our top award. The Sony ZV-1 was designed specifically for vloggers, but this compact camera is an excellent option for still photographers too. We got our hands on the brand new Instax SQ1: an easy-to-use instant camera that shoots square format film. Despite a couple of quirks, we think it's a camera that photographers and non-photographers alike will find fun to use.
Sony's a7C is among the smallest full-frame mirrorless cameras you can buy, and in terms of core capability, not much has been sacrificed for the sake of compactness. But are you ready to make it your next go-to travel camera? Find out how it stacks up in our initial review. It includes updates to Panasonic's DFD autofocus system, creative photo modes, and video features that come close to matching the more expensive S1H.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
If you want a camera that you can pick up and use without having to page through the manual first, then this guide is for you. We've selected seven cameras ranging from compacts to full-frame, all of which are easy to operate.
Long-zoom compacts fill the gap between pocketable cameras and interchangeable lens models with expensive lenses, offering a great combination of lens reach and portability. Read on to learn about our favorite enthusiast long zoom cameras. Submit a News Tip!The E-M5 series has a special place in our hearts because the original E-M5 was the first mirrorless model we tested when we started our blogging venture in At the time, the camera introduced very interesting technology such as five axis stabilisation while also providing advanced weather sealing for a reasonable price.
The E-M5 II came out three years later with improved stabilisation and the first high res shot mode on a mirrorless model. We were not asked to write anything about these products, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Within the article, there are affiliate links.
If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. Thank you! To open them, I changed the camera model name in the exif data so that the program would interpret the files as E-M1X files. The E-M5 II features a Olympus informed me that it is an updated version, although I have yet to see what kind of benefits it may bring. With the E-M1X, Olympus tweaked the sensitivity to improve shadow recovery but as a result highlight recovery decreased.
The image processor has been updated too, unsurprisingly. The sensitivity range is the same: to ISO. I have yet to test them side by side to see if this is indeed the case.
I have never seen a 2 stop improvement between 16MP and 20MP sensors when comparing other micro four thirds cameras, but the gap between these two models is larger so perhaps there will be a bit more to talk about. Below you can see an example at and ISO taken with the new camera. The crop looks quite good whereas noise increases considerably at ISO.
The Super Sonic Wave Filter causes the membrane vibrate 30, times per second when you turn on the camera to get rid of dust. This is the same implementation seen on the E-M1X.
Finally, both cameras can take pictures with the High Res shot mode, where 8 images taken with a half a pixel sensor shift between each shot are combined to create more resolution than what the native sensor has to offer. To my eyes it is the most important actually. The E-M5 II uses an outdated contrast detection system with 81 points. The video performance is slow. This means better performance in C-AF and Tracking, especially when taking pictures of sports and birds in flight.
The camera inherits the same algorithm seen on the E-M1X where the recorded images are analysed in addition to the live view to improve accuracy. Olympus said that the algorithm has been further tweaked to prevent the autofocus from jumping to the background. Low light sensitivity has been improved as well and is the same as the E-M1X -6Ev with f1. In my brief time with the E-M5 III, I definitely noticed a welcome improvement in video mode, with the camera being able to follow the subject even in low light conditions, as you can see below.
Face and Eye detection is present on both cameras and once again phase detection AF improves speed and accuracy on the new camera. Video is another big update for the E-M5 line-up. While the camera provides decent quality, it never managed to reach the same level as other competitors when it comes to sharpness.
In p, the new camera can record up to fps and the bitrate in Full HD is Mbps up to 30fps. With the latter you can also get a headphone output with the optional HDL-8G landscape grip.Although it has been designed with beginners in mind, it retains most of the advanced features found on other Olympus mirrorless products. The E-M5 II is a mid-range model that aims squarely at enthusiast photographers. Despite being two years old, it has no trouble standing up against the competition with one of the best image stabilisation systems on the market, a robust construction and a few features normally reserved for the flagship models.
The two cameras have a few things in common, the most important being the Four Thirds sensor: it has 16MP of resolution and a ISO range. The image processor is more modern on the E-M10 mark III however and brings new functionalities such as 4K video and an updated autofocus system.
Curious about how they compare? Then read on to discover the ten main differences between these two Olympus models! Ethics statement : The information supplied in this article is based on official specifications and our personal experience with OM-D cameras.
If we get the chance to test the two cameras side-by-side, we will publish a full comparison. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation.
Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page.
Thank you! The first difference concerns the build quality. The E-M5 II has more function buttons including one on the front and four on top.
The main shooting mode dial can be locked and you also find a function lever on the rear. The E-M10 III has fewer custom buttons because Olympus decided to assign default, non-changeable settings to many of them, including the 4-way pad on the rear. Both cameras can be found in black or silver but only the E-M5 II comes in a special titanium edition. The prominent front grip on the E-M10 III makes it more comfortable to hold with large lenses but renders it incompatible with accessories such as the ECG-3 grip.
The E-M5 II on the other hand has two options. The latter features a headphone output and is required to attach the HLD-8 battery grip.